Files
pdfcraft/docs/research/pdf-workflows/README.md
T

74 lines
4.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# PDF workflow research reference
> **Last reviewed:** 2026-10-17 · **Last updated:** 2026-10-17 · **Status:** reference documentation. Feature and roadmap snapshot: [`924c4da4`](https://github.com/storytold/pdfcraft/tree/924c4da4ac2879ac9107c6c82e20ac6be5570f0a), dated 2026-10-16. Detailed code inspection remains pinned to `3f044b62`, dated 2026-10-13.
This reference consolidates archived comparative research, public source locators and
PdfCraft feature evidence. It separates documented workflows, historical observations,
evaluation criteria and current feature records so contributors can assess the collected
material without treating an old research claim as a present product fact.
The documentation is independent of feature implementation. It introduces no new project
roadmap, implementation assignments, delivery estimates or feature-completion claims.
Planning remains in [ROADMAP.md](../../../ROADMAP.md) and the
[feature checklist](../../../parity/acrobat-features.toml).
## Contents
| Reference | Contents |
|---|---|
| [Comparative research](competitive-research.md) | Nineteen product studies and eighteen workflow families, with evidence limitations and archived corrections. |
| [Source register](source-register.csv) | 180 unique public locators, their archive dates, recovered provenance and explicit verification states. |
| [Workflow reference](workflow-reference.md) | Twenty research domains: existing foundations, retained findings and evaluation dimensions. |
| [Feature mapping](feature-mapping.csv) | 124 existing parity IDs with their exact status and milestone at the pinned snapshot, linked to the research domains. |
| [Interaction evidence](interaction-evidence.md) | Inspected document ownership, job outcomes, save, keyboard and review foundations, distinguished from historical evaluation criteria. |
## Evidence and dates
The archive includes sixteen product studies, a community-demand sample, an expanded
desktop/platform survey and interface investigations. Research dates span July–October
2026. Three additional desktop products appear in the expanded survey. The source register
is a navigation aid rather than independent proof of any product's current behavior.
`archived-not-revalidated` means that the locator was recovered from a dated study; its
supporting passage and current edition have not been checked for this handoff.
`locator-reconstructed-not-revalidated` means that the original study named a source
without preserving its complete URL. Neither state means a web-archive capture exists.
Vendor-hosted community posts remain community reports, not vendor policy statements.
Community snippets describe questions and reported pain points. They do not establish
market share, incidence or representative satisfaction. Historical pricing, licensing,
legal, security and superiority assertions are excluded. No competitor was installed or
benchmarked for this documentation contribution.
## Reconciliation with PdfCraft
Earlier research described measurement, a command palette, visual comparison, Tags panels
and reusable actions as missing. The inspected source and newer checklist already contain
those foundations, including synchronized side-by-side comparison and recursive folder
batches. The workflow reference records those corrections and reuses the existing oracle
tools rather than describing a second implementation.
The dated mapping is not another live checklist. Current status comes from
`parity/acrobat-features.toml`; the ranked priorities and progress remain in
[gaps.md](../../gaps.md), [roadmap.md](../../roadmap.md) and
[ui-parity.md](../../ui-parity.md). An existing inconsistency in knockout-rendering
evidence is identified without changing its recorded status.
## Publication and verification scope
These are newly written summaries and public source links. No third-party screenshots,
visual designs, source code, fonts, sample documents, private paths, account data or raw
session logs are included. Historical implementation classes, toolkit choices and old
effort estimates are not adopted as PdfCraft architecture.
Static checks cover the feature IDs, statuses, milestone assignments, reference IDs and
local links. Evaluation scenarios are research criteria, not tests already executed.
This handoff claims no native acceptance, screen-reader verification, external-reader
compatibility result, vendor benchmark or compliance certification.
## Revision history
| Date | Change |
|---|---|
| 2026-10-17 | Consolidated the archived research, source register, workflow evidence and pinned feature mapping. |