Files
pdfcraft/crates/engine
496e37d72b M5: text boxes and typed text take an oval or a circle for their border (#4543)
* Fill & Sign: a Border control for typed text, and a border colour of its own

Rebased onto main as one commit: main's Fill & Sign text colour (#2444) runs through the
same places as the border (the open box, typed(), the page input, the toolbar and the
preferences), so every step of the branch met it again. Text colour and border now travel
together as TypedLook (typed_with), which keeps typed() and the new function under Clippy's
argument limit; a border without its own colour takes the text's. Make Current Properties
Default on typed text also keeps its colour for new text now.

The branch's commits, in order:
- Typewriter text: a border change grows its box on every side, so the text keeps its place
- Fill & Sign: a Border control for typed text and dates
- Parity: the typewriter border's evidence
- i18n: the Border label in every catalog, recorded in ATTRIBUTION.toml
- Text boxes, typewriter text and callouts: a border colour of their own
- Fill & Sign: the toolbar follows the selected text; a Border colour button
- fill_sign_add and comment_edit take `border_color`
- Parity: the border colour and the toolbar following the selection
- i18n: Border colour and Same as text in every catalog, recorded in ATTRIBUTION.toml
- Typed text's border: /Border's width is read, a non-finite border colour refused, a saved Same as text restored
- Fill & Sign: the toolbar changes only the selected text; Make Current Properties Default keeps new text's border
- Review: Make Properties Default gives a text box's or callout's tool its border colour
- i18n: the new labels in the Persian catalog, recorded in ATTRIBUTION.toml
- Review: a test that dragging the Font size control resizes the selected text to where the drag ends
- Rebase: the typed text's border in main's annot and comments modules (Style's border colour, exports), and craft_ui's ComboBox

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* M5: text boxes and typed text take an oval or a circle for their border

Rebased onto #4146's new head as one commit (see there: main's Fill & Sign text colour runs
through the same places). The border shape goes into TypedLook's border with the width and
colour; a circle around typed text still takes the snug box.

The branch's commits, in order:
- Text boxes and typed text take an oval or a circle for their border
- A circle goes snug around its text
- Review: fill_sign_add takes an oval or a circle only with a border
- Review: a circle made on a quarter-turned page is sized from the text as shown
- Review: Border ▸ None takes an oval or a circle away with the line
- Review: the Border colour button shows the selected text box's own colour
- i18n: Border shape in the Persian catalog, recorded in ATTRIBUTION.toml
- Review: Border ▸ None on a circled text is one undo step
- Rebase: the border shape in main's annot, engine and comments modules; craft_ui's ComboBox; Fill & Sign's border controls in a function of their own (main's complexity limit)
- Review: Thickness 0 in Comment Properties takes an oval or a circle away, as Border ▸ None does

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Open the Font size popup first in the drag test: main moved the size into a popup

* Border shape per selected comment, and split the oval/circle border out of draw_free_text (clippy cognitive complexity)

* Re-run CI (the push of the main merge did not start it)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: FredApps <FredApps@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-11-05 17:32:01 +01:00
..

pdfcraft-engine

The façade every frontend talks to. It holds the open documents, their edit history and the tool catalogue; frontends never reach past it into the parsing, rendering or editing crates.

word_count::count provides cancellable, page-at-a-time Unicode word and character statistics with optional semantic exclusions; see word-count behavior and limits.

  • Layer: L6. It depends on most of L1–L4 and on nothing above itself. No UI toolkit — egui, winit, eframe and rfd are forbidden below L7, and xtask layers enforces it.
  • The crate denies unwrap/expect/panic!/todo!. Entry points that run untrusted-document code keep a last-resort catch_unwind guard so an escaped panic becomes an error and the user keeps their document.

Two frontends exist on top of it today: pdfcraft-ui-egui (desktop and web) and pdfcraft-automation (headless tools, the CLI and MCP). Anything one can do, the other must be able to do — see AGENTS.md §3.

When dynamic XFA layout is active, JsRunner does not initialize Acrobat JavaScript with scripts from the PDF container's /Names /JavaScript tree. Those scripts belong to the fallback PDF view and can otherwise show a misleading viewer-compatibility warning. They remain in the document and in Document::document_scripts. Requested console scripts, field actions and XFA events can still show messages; ordinary PDFs, static XFA and shells without an active layout keep their document scripts. Converting XFA to a static form and undoing that conversion switches the context with the document state.

The editing model

Each open document holds a pdfcraft_cos::Document: the object graph plus a copy-on-write overlay.

  1. An edit runs on a clone. On success the previous state is pushed onto the undo stack. Clones share all unchanged data, so a snapshot is cheap — this is what makes 100 levels of undo affordable on a 200 MB file.
  2. After every edit the working file is produced by an incremental write: the original bytes plus one appended revision.
  3. The view is refreshed from those bytes, so what you see is exactly what Save will write.
  4. Saving rebases onto the written bytes, so the next save appends only new edits.

Consequences worth preserving: the original bytes of an opened file are never rewritten in place; a full rewrite happens only where it must (redaction, PDF/A conversion, print imposition, a changed password); and unknown data survives a round trip because nothing is reconstructed that wasn't understood.

API

let mut s = Session::new();
let id = s.open("report.pdf", Some(path), bytes, None)?;   // -> DocId

s.apply(id, Edit::RotatePages { pages: vec![0], degrees: 90 })?;
let label = s.undo(id)?;                                    // "Rotate pages"
s.redo(id)?;

let doc = s.get(id).ok_or("gone")?;                         // &Document: queries, never edits
doc.can_undo(); doc.editable(); doc.allows_printing();
doc.text_blocks(page); doc.page_boxes(page); doc.security_summary();

let bytes = s.save_bytes(id)?;        // incremental: keeps signatures over earlier revisions valid
let bytes = s.save_full_bytes(id)?;   // full rewrite, garbage-collected
s.mark_saved(id, bytes.clone(), path)?;

Edit is one enum of 75 variants — every undoable change in the product, from RotatePages to AddAnnotation, SetFieldValue, ApplyRedactions and AddWatermark. Adding a feature means adding a variant and handling it in apply, which is what keeps undo, the dirty flag, autosave and the automation tools consistent for free.

Session also owns the operations that produce a new document rather than editing one: create_blank, create_from_images, create_from_text, combine, extract, split, split_by_size, reduced_bytes, optimized_bytes, print_pdf, export_data, and the signing family (sign, sign_with_timestamp, timestamp_document, embed_ltv).

Modules

Module What it holds
commands The command registry: id, label, menu, shortcut, and a Needs precondition encoding document security. Menus, the ⌘K palette, shortcuts and the control channel all read it, so every surface agrees on what exists and when it is enabled
catalog Acrobat's "All tools" information architecture as data — groups, sections, icons, hues, and an Availability of Ready, Planned(milestone) or Provider. The UI renders what is not built yet, honestly
actions PDF action dispatch (go-to, URI, named, set-layer-state, JavaScript)
links Link creation, properties, and finding URLs in page text
js The bridge to pdfcraft-js. forms never depends on js directly; the engine injects it, so a build without JavaScript is possible
xfa, ocr, compare, export Façades over the L3/L4 crates of the same names

Not done here

  • Rendering is still borrowed. pdfcraft-render wraps hayro and inspects through lopdf (ADR-0004). The engine only sees inspect() -> DocInfo, RenderPool and text::PageText, and that API stays frozen while M2 replaces what is behind it.
  • Performance budgets (misc.performance-budgets) are not set or enforced.
  • Some shipped features are still reachable only from the UI, not through an automation tool; cargo xtask parity lists them; closing that gap is tracked in the execution plan (D4).

doc.text_edit_preview(page, block) prepares a read-only page background with the selected paragraph’s glyphs removed, preserving text positioning, images and colours. It shares the working document’s render configuration and never enters the undo history.